Pushing the dreaded ‘red dot’ around
Maps depict incidents of: Assault, Asst. w/ weapon, sexual assault, fighting, gun seen, gun known, shots fired, gunshot wound, robberies and stabbing reports
Violent Crime Hotspots March 29, 2008 to March 28, 2009 (1 year)
– High intensity (over 1,400 dispatched events) zones along Main near Burrows and In the Central Park Area (that disperses in all directions)
– Zones of Concern (no fewer than 1,100 dispatched events) at Higgins and Main and along Portage near Portage Place Mall.
Violent Crime Hotspots March 29, 2009 to March 28, 2010 (1 year)
– High intensity zones at Main and Henry, and along Portage near Portage Place Mall.
– Zones of Concern in Central Park and along Main to about Euclid and Main at Henry.
What do the maps appear to say?
- Police-reported violence in Central Park appears to be on the wane
- The area around Portage Place has become more violent
- Suggests there’s a contradiction in the current of opinion that states safety downtown is a matter of perception, not reality
- Some of the violence plaguing north main past the Higgins underpass appears to have migrated south to the area near the Sally Ann and the new WRHA building
- The CCTV camera at Main and Henry appears to be to one most likely to catch criminal activity
- There’s a growing pocket of crime a block or so south of Salter near Manitoba and Magnus
These maps were embedded in a report on the effectiveness of the WPS’ crime camera pilot project. You can read about what it says here.
The precis version is that technological hiccups may have limited how effective the cameras can be, and there’s [apparently] no conviction results yet (from 2009? really?) to measure if the footage is holding up in court.
The tech. problems prompted State of the City to sagely ask: ” I also don’t get how (police) became responsible for tech risk & maintenance costs in the 1st place.”